This picture appeared alongside Cricinfo’s post match ode to the Indian batting line up. I thought it was very fitting. MS Dhoni is what can only be described as an impossible position, especially with the wickekeeper standing up to the stumps. Was this a Shane Warnesque bouncer-in-disgust from the slow bowler, which Dhoni was trying to upper cut a la Tendulkar at Chennai in 2001? No! The ball went bang in the middle of the most orthodox ‘V’ that Geoffrey Boycott could have drawn.
This is how Indias batting has been in the last 6-7 years (especially amongst the post Tendulkar-Dravid generation of batsmen). None of them have been orthodox, all of them (including Ganguly) have had glaring technical faults. Yet, most of them, have delivered runs and if you look at the numbers, the reason why India have competed in ODI cricket, has been because of these batsmen. Yet, it is invariably the batting which has borne the brunt of the blame during slumps. ODI cricket is a batsman’s game, but having the most profligate bowling lineup in the world doesn’t help, especially when the batting is occasionally not on song.
Yet, there has always remained that tinge of dismay, about batting success being limited to certain kinds of wickets. This is not true of the Indian side, any more than it is true of any other side in the world. All batting line ups do well on batting wickets, thats why they are called good batting wickets. The point is however, that in a batting game, limited overs run rates have been steadily climbing, and India have been at the fore front of this development, which suggests that they have been at the forefront of world batting. While the next generation of batsmen in India are a cause of worry, todays batting is amongst the best in the world. With a rejuvenated Ganguly (free of the insecurities and the baggage of captaincy and allied responsibilities), with nothing much to lose, and plenty of talent and experience to spend has much to offer. He still has his problems against the short ball, which every now and again conspire to demolish the rest of his footwork. But as long as he is in the right frame of mind, and can execute his block-block-bang theory of ODI opening, opposition sides will worry about him.
Tendulkar in the middle order also looks like a great idea. At this stage, it is quite perfect for him to be unleashed on the opposition at number 3 or 4 (i would suggest 3, especially when the early wicket falls). As we saw yesterday in Baroda, the results can be quite dazzling. It is a indicative of the class that has always characterized Tendulkar, Dravid and Ganguly, that they always appear to have something in reserve when they have long partnerships. Yesterday, Dravid and Tendulkar added 116 in 18 overs – yet, anyone who watched, might have been forgiven for wondering what might have been had they not been so slow in the early part of their stand.
The great advantage that Tendulkar, Dravid and Ganguly have over new batsmen is that they know how to score runs in ODI cricket (its called experience), and that comes to the fore every now and then. But there is always the Dhoni element to India’s batting, which leaves is short of what Australia’s has become – Indias best batsmen in recent times have been unorthodox, picked on outrageous talent (like Yuvraj Singh), with no real honing ground other than international cricket. Australia’s outrageous talent is honed in their domestic cricket, for it is tested in their domestic cricket.
That is a shortcoming, which will require the entire genius of the Indian batting to extend itself beyond known boundaries to surmount.